Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Feb 16 - Upper Canada & Lord Durham

         December 1837, a rebellion broke out
         Radical leaders planned attacks  in both colonies, since Britain did not have enough troops to fight back everywhere
         Wanted an American style democracy – distanced themselves from many English immigrants who saw the U.S. as an enemy


Family Compact
         Small group of wealthy, powerful men who dominated Upper Canada from the late 18th to mid-19th century
         Controlled the government (oligarchy) and monopolized political offices
         Influenced banking, land contracts, education, court and church affairs
         Opposed American Revolution against Britain

Land Issues
         Settlers forced  Aboriginals to move off their reserves further inland
         Best land granted to members of the Family Compact
         Best farmland in the hands of non-farmers
         Crown and clergy reserves:
         Blocks of land set aside to provide income (through sale or rent) for the government and for the Anglican Church
         2/7 of all land in Upper Canada
         Scattered and un-cleared throughout the townships
         Blocked road development
         Tied up prime, arable land
         Caused value of land to rise higher

Transportation Issues
         Road conditions poor and impassable – could not move farmers’ goods and markets
         Government spent money on canal building instead
         Benefitted the Family Compact and business friends

Tories
         Friends and supporters of the Family Compact
         Known as Conservatives or Tories
         Wanted to “conserve” existing form of government
         Opposed change
         Supported Britain’s point of view and system of government
         Members of the Executive and Legislative Council

Moderate Reformers
         Wanted to change system of government through legal means
         Often influential, well-educated, and Anglican
         Never wanted to break away from Britain
         Supported responsible government
         Hopes squashed by John Russell’s Ten Resolutions and appointment of Sir Francis Bond Head governor 1836

William Lyon Mackenzie
         Most blunt reformer was William Lyon Mackenzie
         His newspaper the Colonial Advocate attacked the Family Compact and governor
         Printed scandals and gossip for all to read
         Elected to Legislative Assembly and continued fiery attacks on the government
         Kicked out of the Assembly a number of times



Radical Reformers
         Wanted change immediately – including through violence
         Many were restless moderate reformers
         William Lyon Mackenzie wanted a new and independent government if rebel demands not met
         Hoped to empower Legislative Assembly

Upper Canada Rebellion
         Soldiers sent to assist in Lower Canada’s rebellion, Mackenzie decided to strike York (Toronto)
         Unable to convince widespread support, ordered attack at Montgomery’s Tavern
         Rebellion short-lived and squashed by Sir Francis Bond Head due to lack of military experience, equipment, and planning
         Mackenzie fled to the U.S.; many radicals fled here too
         Arrested by Americans and jailed for 18 months



What happened to the Rebels?
         Punishment
        Quick and severe to deter others from rebellion
        Leaders publicly hung
        Flogging
        Convict Ships
         Transported to the Caribbean or Australia
         Low-ceiling, cramped
         Chained to the wall or deck
         No bathroom facilities
         Little ventilation
        Used for slave labour on plantations and projects



Lord Durham
         John Lambton, the Earl of Durham
         Aristocrat and reformer politician
         British appointed him Governor-in-Chief of the Canadas
         Wanted him to investigate the situation and recommend solutions
         Arrived in Spring 1838
         Major Recommendations:
         Upper Canada and Lower Canada should be united
         Should grant the colonies responsible government
         Elected, not appointed by the governor
         Can be voted out if failed to please the majority
         Assimilate or anglicize the French majority in Lower Canada
         Consequences:
         Act of Union 1840
         United Upper and Lower Canada
         Montreal the capital
         French displeased
         His goal was to assimilate French into English culture
         Assimilate: absorb/integrate
         French did not support or participate the union
         Responsible government granted in 1848



No comments:

Post a Comment