Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Feb 16 - Upper Canada & Lord Durham

•         December 1837, a rebellion broke out
•         Radical leaders planned attacks  in both colonies, since Britain did not have enough troops to fight back everywhere
•         Wanted an American style democracy – distanced themselves from many English immigrants who saw the U.S. as an enemy


Family Compact
•         Small group of wealthy, powerful men who dominated Upper Canada from the late 18th to mid-19th century
•         Controlled the government (oligarchy) and monopolized political offices
•         Influenced banking, land contracts, education, court and church affairs
•         Opposed American Revolution against Britain

Land Issues
•         Settlers forced  Aboriginals to move off their reserves further inland
•         Best land granted to members of the Family Compact
•         Best farmland in the hands of non-farmers
•         Crown and clergy reserves:
•         Blocks of land set aside to provide income (through sale or rent) for the government and for the Anglican Church
•         2/7 of all land in Upper Canada
•         Scattered and un-cleared throughout the townships
•         Blocked road development
•         Tied up prime, arable land
•         Caused value of land to rise higher

Transportation Issues
•         Road conditions poor and impassable – could not move farmers’ goods and markets
•         Government spent money on canal building instead
•         Benefitted the Family Compact and business friends

Tories
•         Friends and supporters of the Family Compact
•         Known as Conservatives or Tories
•         Wanted to “conserve” existing form of government
•         Opposed change
•         Supported Britain’s point of view and system of government
•         Members of the Executive and Legislative Council

Moderate Reformers
•         Wanted to change system of government through legal means
•         Often influential, well-educated, and Anglican
•         Never wanted to break away from Britain
•         Supported responsible government
•         Hopes squashed by John Russell’s Ten Resolutions and appointment of Sir Francis Bond Head governor 1836

William Lyon Mackenzie
•         Most blunt reformer was William Lyon Mackenzie
•         His newspaper the Colonial Advocate attacked the Family Compact and governor
•         Printed scandals and gossip for all to read
•         Elected to Legislative Assembly and continued fiery attacks on the government
•         Kicked out of the Assembly a number of times



Radical Reformers
•         Wanted change immediately – including through violence
•         Many were restless moderate reformers
•         William Lyon Mackenzie wanted a new and independent government if rebel demands not met
•         Hoped to empower Legislative Assembly

Upper Canada Rebellion
•         Soldiers sent to assist in Lower Canada’s rebellion, Mackenzie decided to strike York (Toronto)
•         Unable to convince widespread support, ordered attack at Montgomery’s Tavern
•         Rebellion short-lived and squashed by Sir Francis Bond Head due to lack of military experience, equipment, and planning
•         Mackenzie fled to the U.S.; many radicals fled here too
•         Arrested by Americans and jailed for 18 months



What happened to the Rebels?
•         Punishment
–        Quick and severe to deter others from rebellion
–        Leaders publicly hung
–        Flogging
–        Convict Ships
•         Transported to the Caribbean or Australia
•         Low-ceiling, cramped
•         Chained to the wall or deck
•         No bathroom facilities
•         Little ventilation
–        Used for slave labour on plantations and projects



Lord Durham
•         John Lambton, the Earl of Durham
•         Aristocrat and reformer politician
•         British appointed him Governor-in-Chief of the Canadas
•         Wanted him to investigate the situation and recommend solutions
•         Arrived in Spring 1838
•         Major Recommendations:
•         Upper Canada and Lower Canada should be united
•         Should grant the colonies responsible government
•         Elected, not appointed by the governor
•         Can be voted out if failed to please the majority
•         Assimilate or anglicize the French majority in Lower Canada
•         Consequences:
•         Act of Union 1840
•         United Upper and Lower Canada
•         Montreal the capital
•         French displeased
•         His goal was to assimilate French into English culture
•         Assimilate: absorb/integrate
•         French did not support or participate the union
•         Responsible government granted in 1848



No comments:

Post a Comment